{"id":785,"date":"2024-02-12T16:59:34","date_gmt":"2024-02-12T16:59:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stg-internationalforum.bmj.com\/london\/?p=785"},"modified":"2024-02-20T13:33:53","modified_gmt":"2024-02-20T13:33:53","slug":"v5-how-biased-is-my-work-better-designs-for-impact-evaluation-and-dissemination","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stg-internationalforum.bmj.com\/london\/2024\/02\/12\/v5-how-biased-is-my-work-better-designs-for-impact-evaluation-and-dissemination\/","title":{"rendered":"V5: How biased is my work? Better designs for impact, evaluation and dissemination"},"content":{"rendered":"<br><p><strong>Friday 12 April | 13:30-14:15<\/strong><\/p><br><p><em>Format: Online session<br>Stream: Science<br>Content filters: n\/a<\/em><\/p><br><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Why do learning and evaluation often take a back seat in QI? The elements of good improvement design \u2013 a clear description of program theory, understanding and mitigating bias, accounting for secular change and the &#8220;counterfactual&#8221;, and considering a broader range of study designs \u2013 can accelerate learning and impact. In this session we will present examples of QI projects that demonstrate why and how programs succeed or fail. We will propose a simple 3-part framework to promote learning, evaluation and dissemination. We will be your guides, building your knowledge and confidence to move these important principles to the &#8220;front seat&#8221; of your improvement work.<\/span><\/p><br><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As a result of the session, participants will be able to:<\/span><\/p><br><ol><br><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Appreciate gaps in rigour and credibility of QI programs<\/span><\/li><br><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Understand and apply methods for mitigating bias and strengthening causal inference<\/span><\/li><br><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Apply rigorous approaches to designing QI programs that promote credible results and learning<\/span><\/li><br><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Understand, explain, and test commonly used evaluation frameworks and measures<\/span><\/li><br><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Deploy IHI&#8217;s evolving evaluation framework for adaptive designs, learning and dissemination<\/span><\/li><br><\/ol><br><p><a href=\"https:\/\/stg-internationalforum.bmj.com\/london\/2023\/06\/21\/pierre-barker\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><b>Pierre Barker <\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Institute of Healthcare Improvement (IHI), USA<\/span><\/p><br><p><a href=\"https:\/\/stg-internationalforum.bmj.com\/london\/2024\/02\/12\/don-goldman\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><b>Don Goldman<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Institute of Healthcare Improvement (IHI), USA\u00a0<\/span><\/p><br>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Friday 12 April | 13:30-14:15Format: Online sessionStream: ScienceContent filters: n\/aWhy do learning and evaluation often take a back seat in QI? The elements of good improvement design \u2013 a clear description of program theory, understanding and mitigating bias, accounting for secular change and the &#8220;counterfactual&#8221;, and considering a broader range of study designs \u2013 can [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-785","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-internationalforum.bmj.com\/london\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/785","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-internationalforum.bmj.com\/london\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-internationalforum.bmj.com\/london\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-internationalforum.bmj.com\/london\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-internationalforum.bmj.com\/london\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=785"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stg-internationalforum.bmj.com\/london\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/785\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-internationalforum.bmj.com\/london\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=785"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-internationalforum.bmj.com\/london\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=785"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-internationalforum.bmj.com\/london\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=785"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}